carlton e.'s profileCottons PlacePhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
March 19 Protest to save America for Americans.Peaceful protests have worked in the past. Martin Luther king,and others. Police won't check IDs and the government won't save jobs for Americans. Cashiers don't want to touch pork so they refuse to check you out at the supermarket. Cab drivers tell you to get out because of their religion.Now we Americans are to learn to speak Spanish and what ever the Arabs speak.The immigrants want separate communities and laws for them send them back to where they came from and throw the ones making laws or ignoring the law just for them in jail. Jobs for those born in this country and for legal immigrants only. Find where the illegal aliens rent,work,pray and play and show up and stay till the police show up and be sure to inform the TV crews. Start a protest movement in America and in every town and lawn and any place that they gather to get work.Go in big groups and bring attention to the problem.Picket them on the bus,cafés,stores,street,shops,post office,and anywhere someone has hired them are any state office helping them.. Elections start next year. Get some press and Get on TV till it hurts and some one will have to pay attention to what we need in America. Show actors who bad mouth the country how we feel by forming a protest in front of movies and shut off their money It's time we stood up for our country. If the store has a "we speak Spanish "sign, picket them. This is our country. If you want to live here then talk our language! Don't expect us to change our language to suit you. This summer lets become the "300" who stopped the big army from coming to our country. The Congress and president and supreme court and all elected officials and police want to listen to the few hollering from the streets then we will holler till the cows come home.we ask congress to stop infighting and let the war take care of its self and turn your attention to taking care of the ones who put you in office.All of the American people. If the guys running for office want to ignore the problems and go to 1000 dollar plate dinners to speak, then we can make them a 1 million dollar protest in front of the dinner.We want laws to protect Americans not criminals.No more legal immigrants till all born in America have jobs.Health care,wages,Representatives that listen to and are supportive of the ones who put them in office.no more lobby for favors,no more money donated to run for office.Fix the Schools. Get a picket sign that says "Hire an American" and go stand where they pick up illegal aliens for work and wait for police to escort you out. Another good sign is "Don't buy here keep money at home" and "Support a soldier overseas". There are foreign nationals running stores here and I turn around and go to another store and won't shop there. Nor will I ride in a cab driven by Iraq,Iran or India. I wont shop Target Stores, not going to support a thief. It worked in the 1960s and can work again to bring attention to what companies are doing. Employers hate losing money or bad publicity news on TV. It's going to be a hot summer so lets heat it up at home and overseas. Instead of watching Islams CHANTING death to Americans ,lets go in the streets chanting America for Americans. Illegal aliens marching in our streets and trying to change the laws,send them home in cattle cars and those in congress with them. In the first gulf war in Saudia Arabia America women soldiers could not roll up their sleeves or face arrest,the American flag had to be taken off the uniforms. Now we have the same people come here to our country and telling us to change to accommodate them. Send them home and some of the police and elected officials with them.
there are laws in all the states that you can not aid and abet a criminal and then they deport all the workers for being here as illegal aliens and wont arrest the employers for breaking the law. We the people are the ones who will lose in the long run.
Hit them where it hurts, the pocket book.
Americans are Pigs???? The pig is so offensive to Muslims that some will not even pronounce the word. But to most of the rest of the world it is a farm animal on a par with the sheep, goat or cow.
A few posts off internet below, How about hitting them in face with a baseball bat? Something needs to be done before they start blowing themselves up in our grocery stores, or killing people getting hair cuts. They are becoming more and more bold in America and every single one of us is in danger. What will you do, when one of them runs into a school and blows himself to pieces along with several hundred children, because they are serving hotdogs? Or because we are not teaching our children Islam? Or maybe just because it's Monday? Are these people really that naive? I mean seriously, if pork products are that big of a problem for you for whatever reason, why in the hell would you get a job at a store that sells pork products? Common sense right? I say fire them, but then that would be discriminating against someone for there religous beliefs. And God knows these muslims would sue the hell out of Target. God forbid that Americans don't meet every need of the less than 1% of muslim immigrants in this country (of which we didnt' ask to come here), maybe we should just wipe there asses while we're at it. Last time I checked I thought the majority ruled this country. I just don't understand why we need to pamper every small group that can't understand we live in the real worldAre you aware of the fact that I can NOT but wine or liquor in Texas on Sunday because some religious groups are offended? Are you aware that there can be no whorehouses in Texas because some religious groups are offended? Are you aware that religious groups are so powerful that they control the FCC and prevent Howard Stern and others from saying "bad words" on the air. Pharmacists across the country are refusing to fill prescriptions for birth control and morning-after pills, saying that dispensing the medications violates their personal moral or religious beliefs.Wisconsin is one of at least 11 states considering "conscience clause" laws that would protect pharmacists . Four states already have laws that specifically allow pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions that violate their beliefs.
It appears that the Political Correctness monster has raised it's head again. I cannot, after finding out the duties of the job, imagine someone saying yes to get the job and then no because religious beliefs are in the way, unless it is to force debate and create controversy knowing that Americans cannot agree on anything now days. I would simply leave the groceries right where they were, still in the cart and all on the conveyor if they refused to bag it, and certainly would not give them my money at all and ensure never to go in the door again. This madness will end when we stop giving in to "ethnic" minorities who should either live by our rules in a liberal democracy or go some where else more in tune with their lunatic "beliefs"!!!!
The pig is so offensive to Muslims that some will not even pronounce the word. But to most of the rest of the world it is a farm animal on a par with the sheep, goat or cow.
when the British supermarket chain Tesco printed a little cartoon of a happy piglet on their till receipts. London Muslims protested, and Tesco changed the printing of their receipts so that no piglets appeared Perhaps the far end of this spectrum would be the removal from Western shops of all wrapping paper, greetings cards and ornaments depicting pigs, on the basis that Muslims visiting the shop or walking past the shop window might catch sight of them and be offended.
So what do we deem as reasonable and the unreasonable. Somewhere a balance must be struck between the degree of distress caused to the minority and the degree of inconvenience, expense or restriction caused by their request to the majority.
One international airline from a non-Muslim country states on its menus the fact that none of the food they serve is prepared with pork products? Would it not be enough to have pork-free meals available for those who requested them? Why must all the rest of the passengers be limited by the dietary restrictions of another faith? What about Hindus, who cannot eat beef, or Buddhists and some stricter Hindus who are vegetarian or vegan because of their faith? What about very strict Hindus who will not eat onions and garlic? What about Jews who cannot combine certain foods in the same dish? Not only must Muslim meals be free of pork, but any meat which is served must have been killed in the name of Allah in order for it to be halal (permitted). While it is perfectly reasonable for the national carriers of Muslim countries to proclaim on their menus that the meals are halal, it is ridiculous for other countries to after follow suit
Is it a fear of violent and extreme reaction that is causing the current trend to yield to the Muslim community's every request. Islam does not reciprocate the treatment it demands for itself. Discrimination against non-Muslims is inbuilt within the tenets of Islam and is deeply embedded in Muslim culture. This thirteen-centuries-old attitude can be seen even on that marvel of modern technology, the Internet. Some of the numerous Muslim web-sites which have sprung up contain material which is extremely critical and abusive of Christianity, or that is harshly anti-Semitic so why is it allowed. There seems to be a growing trend to say "yes" to every request from Muslim minorities in the West, whereas other minorities do not get such an obsequious reaction from the majority. As Islam is a religion which teaches its followers that they should strive to take control of the whole world, this is an alarming trend. Pray for wisdom for those decision-makers involved in these situations whether the issue is large or small. Guess what British banks are banning piggy banks because they may offend some Muslims. Its never ending and until the British people stand up and be counted it will get worse if you are offended by something put in place for muslims alone and against our traditions don't use that organisation,simple as that.
March 17 It is not 1964 and 1970 and the world in 2007 is listening.I watched people on C-Span making speechs and calling for the over throw of our goverment and that the listeners should go home and do all they could to disrupt the workings of schools and local goverments till the soliders were removed from Iraq.Three differnt speakers said this. The internet is broadcast all over the world and so is TV and we need congress to address the problem of the loyalty of a citizen to his or her government and giving them Aid and Comfort by speaking supportively of the enemy the terriosts. Calling the president a name and then saying chavez is mr.President is a traitor and our own nations children are now attacking our leaders and sounding like they are supportive of al-Qaeda. To many sites have sept,11,2001 as being done by our own goverment even thou there were three hearings saying who did it.Congress made the laws and now they need enforceing,starting with Jane Fonda. Every child in american Schools took this oath. "I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all." Federal Employee Oath of Office US Navy I took this one, I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. Allegiance ----Spelled Pronunciation[uh-lee-juh]–noun1.the loyalty of a citizen to his or her government or of a subject to his or her sovereign 2.loyalty or devotion to some person, group, cause, or the like. —Synonyms 1.loyalty —Antonyms 1. treason. 2. treachery. Section 3 - Treason Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of In Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.
Traitor may also mean a person who betrays (or is accused of betraying) their own definition. The crime is prohibited by legislation passed by H.R. 2975 The House's version of the bill.
S. 1510 The Senate's version of the bill.
The USA Act The primary difference between the USA Act and FISA is the definition of The USA Act was quickly combined with the The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 "Reform of the intelligence community"
"Federal Bureau of Investigation"
"Security clearances"
"Transportation security"
"Border protection, immigration, and visa matters"
"Terrorism prevention"
"Implementation of 9/11 Commission recommendations"
"Other matters" This act established both the position of Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC).
On October 11, 2006, a federal grand jury issued the first indictment for treason in the United States since 1952, against Adam Yahiye Gadahn for videos in which he spoke supportively of al-Qaeda.
March 07 Managers also arrested for hiring illegals aliensNEW BEDFORD, Mass. - Dozens of young children were stranded at schools and with baby-sitters after their parents were rounded up by federal authorities who raided a leather goods maker suspected of hiring illegal immigrants, authorities said Wednesday. About two-thirds of the 500 employees of Michael Bianco Inc., mostly women, were arrested Tuesday by immigration officials for possible deportation as illegal aliens. As a result, about 100 children were stuck with baby sitters, caretakers and others, said Corinn Williams, director of the Community Economic Development Center of Southeastern Massachusetts. "We’re continuing to get stories today about infants that were left behind," she said. "It’s been a widespread humanitarian crisis here in New Bedford." The state Department of Social Services was working Wednesday to make sure the children receive proper care. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Julie Myers said eight pregnant women were released and women who were sole caregivers of children would also be released, but it takes time to verify people’s accounts. Managers also arrested
U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan accused Insolia of exploiting the immigrants to maximize his profits on the military contracts for production of backpacks and safety vests for soldiers. A fifth person was arrested on charges of helping illegals obtain fake identification. Investigators described dingy conditions and said the illegal workers faced onerous fines, such as a $20 charge for talking while working and spending more than two minutes in the bathroom. "They were given no options. It’s either here, or the risk of no income at all," U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan said, comparing the plant to sweatshops from the early 1900s. "Clearly, they were exploited because of the fact they were here illegally." Insolia’s lawyer, Inga Bernstein, said: "The whole story will come out, and at that point it will be a very different scenario." Michael Bianco Inc., founded in 1985, specialized in manufacturing high-end leather goods for retailers including Coach Inc. and Timberland Co. before landing a $9.4 million military contract in 2003 to make survival vests. The immigrants had been making leather goods, including vests, grenade pouches and backpacks for soldiers in Iraq, and are now being held at a former Army base near the town of New Bedford where they were working, officials said. An Army spokesman did not return a call seeking comment about the status of the contracts. J R Brown Ok..I'm all for rounding up illegals and arresting crooked business owners, but why on this green earth would they pick a company supplying our military in the middle of a war instead of any of the other companies employing 10-15 million illegal workers is beyond me...it's really stupid. It should have been handled differently...unless there is another supplier which can immediately take up the slack this inevitabley causes?
Sweet Gosh, this story has it all - illegals, unscrupulous exploitation by employers using sweatshop conditions, and fake (or stolen, perhaps???) IDs. Not to be nasty or sarcastic, JRBrown, but wouldn't it be better for our troops if Americans were making the leather vests that protect them in war? And doesn't it bother you that this employer, under a US government contract, was doing to those 'employees' what it was doing and apparently breaking all kinds of US labor laws? eom to jrb Had the executive branch been doing its job in the first place, much of the crackdown wouldn't be necessary because the border security would be fully staffed and funded. The real hypocrisy here is that this administration just asked for 10s of billions more - over and above the present war budget - for sending 21,000 MORE troops to Iraq while it's leaving our borders and ports wide the heck open. Illegals, while treated badly by some employers, also know the risks they take when they enter this country illegally. Employers who hire illegals should have to forfeit any and all extra profit resulting in hiring illegals - in addition to all the fines and legal fees involved. There is a process by which these people can enter the US - through legal channels - like legal immigrants do. The laws are already in place. So are the laws prohibiting US employers from hiring illegals. As for the children and the daycares, the illegals are putting their kids at risk. The onus for this belongs squarely on their shoulders - not those who are doing their jobs and rounding them up. Using the children as excuses to get away with illegal acts is simply reprehensible.
DietDew The sheriff of the county I used to live in has been waging his own war on illegals now for about a year. I just saw on the news today that he sent a bill for $61,000 dollars to the President of Mexico. Keep up the good work! March 01 Punish the employersI M Gator from MSNBC US NEWS Board
Get the employers Man are you all missing the point. Yes they work hard. Yes you can pay them $10 and hour. Of course, they aren't paying any taxes on that money. This means that the taxes that have to be paid are coming from the honest people. I you are hiring them, then the taxes you pay are funding them. Since they don't pay taxes, and are illegal, they don't pay for their medical treatment. So all of you that claim that you would hire them if you want too should be the ones that are charged their taxes. What we need is a reporting and rewarding system that encourages people to turn them in. If we pay the informants with fines charged to the employers, then the employers will stop hiring them. The first person I would investigate is Ron Walker. Mr. "I'll hire anybody I damn well please" shold be fined. If necessary, fine him out of buisness. A fine of $50,000 per incident would not be out of line. If that is not enough, make it $100,000. If that doesn't work shut down their buisness. For good. Then, for good measure, investigate him for tax fraud for not issuing W-2's or 1099's to report who he is paying. Once that is done, audit their buisness taxes and personal taxes and see if we can reduce them to the level of the people they are hiring. Then we will see how they feel about not being able to get work because illegals are taking the jobs. I personally know people who are applying for jobs at Walmart, Lowes, etc. looking for any job. They have no criminal record but want to work. The Mr. Walkers of the world are absolutely taking jobs from Americans. |
|
|